Estimating Deaths in a Nuclear War 

Funny soviet boi

That's a lie. He never said that.

Boo hoo hoo 😢

@john acetable he did

@Canadio I think he did under the bunker with JFK and Fidel Castro when the zombie started invading

TRvid give us warning in nuke war in Ukraine in the future so TRvid algorithms is very good for this video

Does anyone now, how These Animations were made?

@Timo Brandes English not your fist language I’m assuming

@Shush man ok so?

That’s not what a counter sounds like.

caitlyn better

@ben webb I agree bro rn she is

bro think this is modern warfare 🤡

Nah Teemo the best

The real problem is the destroyed infrastructure. There's so many fragile system that required most of its cog to function in order for it to work

Fallout games

@Vysair like those would be as important as securing food and water. They would become the relics of the past only sought after securing your survival.

@Vysair Even if infrastructure did not break down, society could not function. Radioactive dust and the nuclear winter would make it impossible to do natural agriculture, going outside for too long could result in radiation poisoning, and all water, except maybe that which falls out of the sky, would be irradiated. Rising sea levels, cities being left in ruin, power pretty much just disappearing etc. is just the icing on the cake.

The question is not “could humans survive?” Because that’s obviously a yes, the question is “could *you* survive?” And that is much less likely

Yes, even less than the 1%! Its just a bunch of men sitting in an office.

People like the owner of bank of new York mellon

Or that the tool of peace are the MIC and "peacekeepers".

Yea, and it's not the people we voted for that much is obvious.

​@Alejandro Ruizget a woman on that board at that time of the month and the world is over

And that’s how he saved the world

Yup

That guy literally saved the world.

Also Cuba had 100 nukes and not 1. So invading Cuba would have been bad, sadly the USA never knew about the other 99 nukes

@M T Most of those nukes were short range. A shame short range in that context included Florida and much of the east coast, ha!

hello. im just too afraid to watch the video. can you please summarize it? thank u

@jack frost you're* learn how to type first.

@jack frost i don't even understand you

@jack frost were* i'm not even a native. i just know the rules. this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. good night.

GambitKing 5150. Well said! I agree wholeheartedly. If we’re smart we will all support Neil’s quality work. Thanks GambitKing 5150 for speaking up. The world needs more people like you and Neil.

Chatgpt and bard users

We also ft

shut up mom , i told you to wait in the car

It's hard to tell exactly but I don't think that explanation really does it. It is a "correlation does not necessarily imply causation" scenario, because in the same period of time, telecommunications was on the rise, culminating in the internet. 100 years ago there weren't people having friendships or much cultural exchange across national boundaries but now that is frequent, and I think that is actually the cause of less war, it just happens to be at the same period of time that nuclear weapons were developed, namely the last half of the 20th century. There WAS still war after all, it's just no one used nukes because that was a line they weren't going to cross easily, while they were still quite willing to go to war. But it was always across national boundaries where there wasn't a lot of cultural influences. Like the US and Vietnam for instance? How much culture did we get from Vietnam? Not very much. Even now. When is the last time you watched a movie that was made in Vietnam? Read a book written by a Vietnamese person. Bought a car made in Vietnam. Met someone from Vietnam. You can find a few Vietnamese restaurants here and there, but even now it might as well be another planet. Japan on the other hand, has lots of cultural exchanges, NOW, Americans are big on anime. While such a thing didn't exist until after world war 2. Is the threat of nuclear war what is stopping the US from going back to war with Japan? I don't think so. This supports my hypothesis that it has more to do with the rise of Electronic communications than nuclear weapons, it's just that both things happened at the same time so you think it has to do with nuclear weapons.

Bro what are you talking about man I live in Ukraine

@Mindless Person we are talking about war against two superpowers not war against an irrelevant country. Maybe if Ukraine was richer country with nuclear arsenal war would not be started.

Where's that from? Something like that is said in the 'Mad Max' game intro.

@Miguel Bombas I am paraphrasing here, don't remember exactly the actual source; those words are not mine.

similar quote from Dumbledore

Yeah. All sides know that. That's why no nuclear war has occurred yet.

Another quote I heard: “We unlocked a 23rd century in the 20th century, We should treat them as such”

And we're still here because?... Also the humans put in charge of the button are actually quite rational and competent. Go ahead and read up on some of the people who stopped nuclear war from happening for precisely that reason.

It's not

@Smit Patil don't lie to yourself

​@Jordan Oliveto It's really not.

When ever somebody with military superiority kept peace?

​@Foreign Fat quite a few times, its part of their job

Until you also realize the target city is already destroyed by others.

Tbh its better to be in a target city than in a city near it. If a nuclear bomb was dropped you'd die painlessly instead of living and suffering for the rest of your life

Laughs in Ohio

@: 3 but Ohio was hit?

@NightCat28 nah Ohio isn’t that important

Very true. I remember watching Threads

@Benjamin Clarke Yea, lovely graphics.

Normie

With a good mind and some good technology.

General James Longstreet I have a feeling it’s a video game character

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Very true

It’s Thomas Jefferson, he said the quote...

Stealing this! Thank you

Why'd you use chatgpt and bard and dalle e to make a you tube comment lol 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😅😅😅😅

Fabrice Izzo yes a great video no political bias

Fabrice Izzo no

That’s why i love neutrality. It’s the best way to document cruelties around the world, since there is minimal political bias present in it.

How would syudents looking yet another propaganda piece "achieve" more? Do you even know what the word "achieve" means? Apparently not, you should look it up. What it doesn't mean, is blindly believing anything that shows on a screen, large or small.

Donkey Slayer dude in the video is literally speaking facts tho, you really don’t have to stress this hard in some TRvid comments bruh

i still call it crazy. id rather die and be with god than suffer on a destroyed uninhabitable world underground. thats not a life to me anymore

Yes, the prospect of nuclear war remains a serious global threat, and it is important to take steps to prevent it from happening. While the idea of building bunkers may seem extreme, it is understandable that some individuals or groups may feel the need to prepare for the worst-case scenario. However, it is important to note that bunkers may not necessarily guarantee survival in the event of a nuclear war, and the best way to protect ourselves is to work towards global nuclear disarmament and promote peaceful solutions to conflicts.

@Rich Young I can understand why you may feel that way, and everyone has the right to make their own choices about how to respond to the possibility of nuclear war. However, it is important to note that the best way to prevent a nuclear war is to work towards reducing the likelihood of it happening in the first place. This can involve advocating for diplomatic solutions to conflicts, supporting global efforts to reduce and eliminate nuclear weapons, and promoting peace and understanding between nations. It is also important to keep in mind that in the event of a nuclear war, the consequences would be catastrophic and far-reaching, affecting not only those who are directly impacted by the initial blasts but also potentially leading to widespread environmental damage and long-term health consequences. As such, it is essential to work towards a future where we can live in a world free from the threat of nuclear war.

And we are so Close to actually doing it...

*some human beings Most of us want to have a normal life. Others should've never been born.

@Daniel S imagine him discribing the rosk of todays situation

Hubris

The war was already over by the time the bomb dropped

@MASTER-OF- EVIL ww2 was not the Pacific war I think

@FREDDYHUNTER34 WW2 includes the pacific campains.

@8is yes but I dont think the Pacific war ended during the bombs, I think it was just D day, idk I'll search it up

@FREDDYHUNTER34 Japan was the last of the Axis powers to surrender and did so after the bombs. in my opinion, WW2 might as well start with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1937 or you could split the European and Pacific theater into two different conflicts as they kinda were.

You got it recommended too? Damn...

We are so fucked

Why the fuck I get this in my feed today

@GOD IS A GAY NAZI incoming doom i think. Hope its not that right?

I personally hate background music it's just un wanted noise..

For those who may not know, the United States bombed Japan. I'm just commenting this cause it never gets mentioned but as soon as he starts talking about nuclear prevention the US gets mentioned 3 times as a key member, while other countries as france and the UK play a role in that conversation that's equally as crucial. Always be critical when watching these kind of videos. Americans tend to be overly patriotic, take everything with a grain of salt and do your own research.

@JesusJuenger This guy is looking at the situation from a different perspective, albiet one of ridicules skepticism. I agree that persons of power should be monitored.

This channel will become big one day! The animations are very well done and very detailed. I love the way you present the story. Great work !

Damn, 3 years later. I didn’t realize I had all these likes, as well as a creator like. Thanks y’all!

I guess it depends, Biden seems hell bent on taking out Russia.

Ikr

Well lucky you if the world will ever have another war they’ll refrain from using wmds

I'd do chemical before the other two. Most chemical weapons are designed to break down when in contact with either water or sunllight after a few days or weeks. Biological can mutate and hang around for centuries while fallout from nukes is just nothing you want to play with.

@Andrew Dobbin I’m not doing specific order I’m just listing the ones I don’t want to happen. But you got a good point.

​@Sir Ethan the Great I didn't mean you should put them in order. I just meant that if I had to do it I'd engage in chemical warfare long before the others and do everything possible to avoid them because of how long the affects can hang around.

My reasoning 6 days ago: "God we probably won't see anything as bad as Covid for another few decades" Putin: "hold my vodka"

enjoy what? ;-;

@Aei do what you have always wanted to before it’s too late

@RoboPenguin Absolutely horrible advice. Telling people to live for today and don't plan for tomorrow is pretty much the most immoral thing you could say to anybody. If they live for today and don't plan long term, they wont care about living long term. You're literally wrecking your own life because you got lazy and gave up. If you are like that, please don't drag other people down with you.

@DesertStateInEu that is not what I’m saying at all, I’m just saying if you have things you want to do in life don’t wait for them to come to you, go do them while you still can. I’m not saying give up on your responsibilities or long term goals

Do it!!! It's One-Man War that people would love to read! Lemme know when you're starting it :)

Sins of the fathers paid for by the sons...

What about the millions murdered by the Japanese?

@Brain Inavatnow so what? That boy didn't killed them, we must not blame innocents for the deeds of evil.

@Brain Inavatnow how have you even arrived at this thought

@Braininavatnow You think that child knew the consequences? Do you think that, in supporting his country, he and his family would be harmed in such a horrific way? Maybe that child could be replaced by you, as you supported your country.

Be best part is that there are several "one men", one who was in a missile detection center, another was in a submarine, another may have been a border guard, a dictator, a president, a general who was having a good day and could think clearly, a guy who spotted a malfunction in the detection systems, a lot of people could be considered a sigle man or woman who saved all of humanity, all of those definitely are the saints of our society, wether we know it or not

@Furinick I've been thinking the same too. Whenever I lose hope in humanity, I just remind myself that there are saints out there still saving the world without me knowing

Yes Arkhipov definitely helped, but It took more than 1 guy to avoid war....JFK, RFK, Stevenson, Scali, and even Khruschev, Mikoyan, Fomin also were factors. It was how the people above Arkhipov reacted that avoided, or would have caused war

I wonder if there was ever an American who refused to turn the key

@Jørgen i dont think so they train their entire life just to do that a failure would be unthinkable, they just were never ordered to do so

He's going to be thoroughly outraged. Those kind of ppl will not hesitate to push a button to end us all

That math doesn’t add up, unless recently was a decade ago?

@Brian Duffy Idk maybe they meant 96

Me lying on the internet for fun:

@tekashi50 na I’m sure he meant to put 96 lol

Man, he propably made fun of all of you lol

Wish i had those experiences, all im doing to change my perspective a bit is just thinking hard

What was the book called?

@Harrison B I’m afraid I can’t recall

@Harrison B I believe it was Carl Sagan and a couple of other scientist that first proposed the nuclear winter theory. It has become a debated theory now.

@Bobby Wise whats the books name?

who dosent

National Military Command Center is located in Colorado.

Yeah but it’s also home to the NORAD hq Cheyenne Mountain Complex

Denver and the rest of the front range would have been good targets. There are several air force bases (Buckley, the academy, Cheyenne mountain, peterson, and Schriever AFBs), one army base (fort carson), norad, us northern command (the hq for any military operations in north america), alternate command center, colorado national guard, and an army training center

"Target-rich environment" is an accurate description, I believe