The issue is I feel that Haaland had more quality in this game because lewandowski 5 in 9 yes very impressive but Haaland had a streak and if he continued without getting subbed off he would’ve scored more then lewandowski. That’s all I gotta say.
@@Gamer-Steel yes, but the thing is, 5 goals in 9 minutes against prime Wolfsburg (debatable) at the age of 29? Pretty damn impressive. On top of that, lewa didn’t really have a amazing man city team passing to him.
i agree lewa is and was better than haaland but tap ins and headers. if many hate him bcuz of that then we should hate many players. i mean atleast he scoring goals. people have to watch his bvb matches to understand. btw i am not starting an argument
Haaland es un cazador de goles, pilla todos los rechaces y lo único que hace es darle para que vaya a dentro. Es un claro ejemplo de lo importante que es la colocación
Fun fact: everytime guardialo manages a team e.g. Barca, Bayern,City one player seems to always get 5 goals under him such as Messi,lewandowski and now Haaland
@@rashyalwaysscores and, so tap in doesn’t count? You need to score magical goal to be good? Nah not in football, you only need to score and Haaland understood it
@@Yash7031_ i mean you can score with tap ins but its not entertaining as other goals messi scored 5 goals in ucl match hut there were no tap ins haaaland is gonna break meesi record of 91 goals in a year with tap ins thats why i dont watch man city games they are just not fun to watch i like kdbs goals more than any goals of haaland
